Welcome to Syntactic Structures, the Standard Theory (tm) of how linguistics blogging should be done. Your host is the leading authority in whatever field of linguistics he's decided to pronounce on today, and whatever he says -- goes. In my spare time, I allow other people to maintain a blog full of thoughts I agree with on non-linguistic matters.
We've got a lot of ground to cover here, folks, but we'll start with some good old-fashioned score settling. The first thing you need to know is that this other blog is basically wrong about everything. For example, there are no such things as snowclones, which are another example of what some people call the "lexicalist hypothesis", a view that has occasionally -- but erroneously -- been inferred from some previous writings of mine. Since my linguistic creativity is infinite, I can categorically state that there aren't templates of any sort.
I have, however, recently discovered a phenomenon to which I have given the creative and original name of "hailimitations". These are cases where people coincidentally come up with the same pattern, with just a few substantive nouns changed. The name derives from the fact that the first time I happened to come across this pattern, it was in a news item from the Economist, and said "If Eskimos have dozens of words for snow, Germans have as many for bureaucracy." By coincidence, other people have also used a similar string, as in this piece which I independently uncovered, "If Eskimos have N words for snow, then Santa Cruzans must have even more for surf." Since the sentence are almost -- but not exactly -- alike, we might say that they are imitations of each other. That is, if each one was not carefully and lovingly fashioned through the perfectly autonomous innate gifts of syntax unique to every human being. Admittedly, hailimitations would be on far more solid ground if I had come up these examples through introspection, and not by using so-called "empirical" data, but c'est la vie.
Hailimitations are not, however, to be confused with the wholly distinct theoretical object which I call HAILIMITATIONS, which are sentences whose I-language representation includes the concept "hail".
chuckle, snort,
good one SC.
Posted by: Blinger | April 01, 2004 at 02:02 AM
The night of the fight, you may feel a slight sting. That's pride f*cking with you. F*ck pride. Pride only hurts, it never helps.
0af8cf93dd2a8edea28a8d40b2d669f9
Posted by: Dave | April 04, 2009 at 04:15 AM
The night of the fight, you may feel a slight sting. That's pride f*cking with you. F*ck pride. Pride only hurts, it never helps.
0af8cf93dd2a8edea28a8d40b2d669f9
Posted by: Name | April 06, 2009 at 01:59 AM
The time you spend at the office may be the most stressful part of your day, but it doesn't have to be. You have a greater ability to shape your office environment than you may realize.
Posted by: coach sale | June 24, 2010 at 07:46 PM
When you want success as badly as you wanted the air, then you will get it. That is the secret to success.
Posted by: discount coach | July 05, 2010 at 08:07 PM
Giving a smile away takes so little effort and time, let’s make sure that we’ve not the one that others have to pretend is wearing an invisible smile.
Posted by: coach purses | July 07, 2010 at 12:52 AM
All is but lip-wisdom that wants experience.Expericence is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. Do you think so?
Posted by: lacoste shoes 2010 | July 08, 2010 at 08:46 PM
I only lately started out leaving comments! Makes me imagine a tiny extra about what I enjoyed and learned concerning the article! Fantastic recommendations, thanks!Welcome to visit my web http://www.sneakers4sales.com
Posted by: Creative Recreation | July 20, 2010 at 05:38 PM
Each one was not carefully and lovingly fashioned through the perfectly autonomous innate gifts of syntax unique to every human being...
Posted by: Build Your Credit | August 18, 2010 at 05:37 AM
great post,once you believe in your self there's no impossible on it you will get it.
Posted by: Credit Repair Services | August 18, 2010 at 06:07 AM
this year is still not over and many things can happen to end on a positive note.
Posted by: Jhon Neil | November 08, 2010 at 10:33 AM
which are another example of what some people call the "lexicalist hypothesis", a view that has occasionally -- but erroneously -- been inferred from some previous writings of mine. Since my linguistic creativity is infinite, I can categorically state that there aren't templates of any sort.
Posted by: Cheap Chanel Bags | February 11, 2011 at 06:04 PM
I wont argue on it. This is one of the top selection.
Posted by: hawaii helicopter tours | March 09, 2011 at 02:36 AM
Thank you for sharing. Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Have a good time.
Posted by: Home & Garden | May 23, 2011 at 11:29 PM
These are cases where people come through with the same pattern, with only a few names of the substance has changed.
Posted by: אייקידו | October 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM
An original name out of "hailimitations"? It's a cool idea though. :)
Posted by: credit repair letters | November 10, 2011 at 09:10 PM