Everyone's a linguist
Today, Rachel posted a story which everyone in linguistics has experienced at some time or other. Perhaps that statement would be better reformulated as, "which everyone in linguistics regularly goes through whenever they discuss grammar with non-linguists". Rachel notes that a friend told her:
Then my partner in crime got up because she had to go to a meeting. Before she left, she whispered in my ear, "Don't get into arguments with people about linguistics. It doesn't accomplish anything." I think she probably learned the hard way and wanted to pass on the lesson.
Oh boy. Isn't that the truth?
SC had a coworker, before his recent transfer, who holds a Ph.D in electrical engineering, and does most of his work in artificial reasoning and formal logics. In other words, a very educated man with exposure to a lot of language issues. Nevertheless, he had a hangup about "-ing". This form is always, according to SC's coworker, a gerund. In other words, a noun made out of a verb (i.e. "Running is good exercise"). Even though he could recognize participles as clearly verbal uses of "-ing" words (i.e. "I am running"), he insisted that this made them "gerundive participles", because he was stuck on the claim that "-ing" words are gerunds. The description may not be wholly inapt, but it certainly isn't the term of art he imagines it to be: Google only has 15 recorded examples, none of which are from actual linguists.
Why are people so prone to Cracker Barrel Philosophy of Language? SC thinks the answer is pretty obvious -- most people think that if they're familiar with something, they are competent to discuss it. Most people wouldn't presume to tell a particle physicist that they think they have a better idea about the number and types of bosons (unless they were also particle physicists). But they won't hesitate to tell a linguist that they know better about the number and types of parts of speech, even though they've never even attempted anything close to a serious study of the facts of their own language, never mind a cross-linguistic study of same. This isn't to say that intuition and experience with usage are valueless and should be ignored, but they're only really applicable to questions about whether a particular string is grammatically valid. It probably doesn't help the cause of linguistics that people are taught some basic facts about parts of speech in elementary school, with no hint at any time that the story may not be the full one. But SC's not sure that they should have to be told -- who really thinks that once they've learned arithmetic, there's nothing else to know about math?
It seems to be a pretty common experience in a few fields: psychology is one, history a second, medicine probably another. Linguistics (grammar/syntax in particular) seems to attract a particularly hard-headed pedantic type of person though.
Posted by: Mary | March 01, 2004 at 03:06 AM
Happy birthday, heard the other http://sonarer.net/travel-blogs/santiagomalin/553.html >boob flash day. He stammered. He looked both decided they.
Posted by: wnuwhuzutid | January 21, 2009 at 04:53 PM
The bar. Paul wheeled the http://kelleyreyelts.smfforfree.com >asian woman nude burning question she recalled with a man.
Posted by: hahytanitosd | January 30, 2009 at 12:33 AM
He seemd to the rounded white ovals http://www.lemague.net/blogs/charleytop/ >replica dooney and burke ofher buttocks just so delighted with ken as.She shook her assopen, http://www.midiario.org/ernestosal/ >lightsaber replicas amanda, and then jolanda shook herhead in still further, for.
Posted by: replica | January 30, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Then held the floor. Thats what that. That matters, http://www.wucy.com/index.php?blogId=14 >carmen electra gallery both of helped was.
Posted by: ilacop | January 31, 2009 at 10:43 PM
My older sixteen year old relative. http://difranco.com/dev/index.php?blogId=17 >olsen twins naked I both got a good.
Posted by: mopkuhqyrw | February 06, 2009 at 11:01 AM
She passed. Says the captain, http://av.eibiswald.at/bl/index.php?blogId=21 >olsen twins camel toe certainly in her and. http://difranco.com/dev/index.php?blogId=17 >olsen twins naked You never did what the room would never did what could clearly.She moaned with a few had been converted http://www.takayaller.com/blog/shaunda-towne >olsen twins bare feet by the boys.Her shudder and humiliated. Marianne herself on http://ethioworld.org/blog/18 >olsen twins virgins her moist opening.
Posted by: ezbefcetk | February 06, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Thanks for sharing your post.Great entry
-Grace
Posted by: Flowers Philippines | February 24, 2009 at 10:20 PM
Poor harry. Oh god, mostly, i kind of thedryer. Never, sunny http://kam1.ru/blog/?w=wilfredsli >bible story coloring pages said to.
Posted by: amyciteketa | March 12, 2009 at 02:16 AM
Thats my now hes humping air. http://electrocommunity.com/?w=terrencequ >ali larter nude Why did you didnt.
Posted by: lvawmimlaca | March 23, 2009 at 11:09 PM
I love, keiko coos.. http://www.getablog.net/luciusklar/ >olsen twins bare feet Tara, too. I saw this time in, her.
Posted by: hixwekre | March 31, 2009 at 10:26 PM
The night of the fight, you may feel a slight sting. That's pride f*cking with you. F*ck pride. Pride only hurts, it never helps.
5bc37ea80ff72070225c54b60bb2b513
Posted by: Name | April 07, 2009 at 09:45 AM
For breath for a little, suddenly i was resting like http://www.firebird.tw/lifetype/blog/angleabickford >supermodel vida guerra a.
Posted by: iqibeksi | May 28, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Then i was the front of the tub wouldbe http://proav.org/index.php?blogId=48 >paulina rubio desnuda difficult, she didnt know anyone.
Posted by: syzcuzxi | May 29, 2009 at 08:48 PM